Generally
speaking, I tend to be quite proud of my generation in its efforts to stress
the importance of equality but sometimes we fall short of my expectations. By short, I mean really short. Recently one of my close friends, who happens
to be African American, told me a quite unsettling story. She was in a class and her professor
explained that if two people with equal experience and credentials applied for
the same job and one of the two had a more ethnic name, the person with the
more average name is more apt to get the job.
My friends name happens to reflect her ethnicity, as many do, and it is
somewhat unique. Rightfully so, this
upset her. Furthermore, a student proceeded
to explain that a parent is setting their child up for failure by naming them
something ethnic and that parents should choose average names for their
children. That is to say that we are
better off naming our children John, Jill, Bob, or Kate than anything unique or
uncommon. This is disappointing to hear
because I do not think that a person’s name can reflect their abilities in the
workplace. To know that one of my peers
feels that a person’s name can define their future is so discouraging. It is sad that our generation is still
employing prejudice thoughts such as these.
In this day and age it should not continue to be this way, but until
there are some drastic changes, whether you like it or not,
your name makes a difference to how or even if, you are viewed in the
workplace. That is like saying that a
person with brown eyes is a better person to hire than someone with the same
experience and credentials with blue eyes.
It is ludicrous.
After
being so irked by this story I of course encountered another similarly
prejudice story, which was what prompted me to write this blog in the first
place. I was eating lunch with a group
of friends, when one was talking about a job interview she was
anticipating. After awhile of
discussion, of course in a group of girls someone had to ask what she was
planning on wearing to her interview.
She said she was unsure, but most likely black slacks and a nice top
with appropriate shoes. To myself, I
thought this sounded normal; like something most people would expect to wear to
an interview. To my disgust, another
girl suggested that she wear a skirt rather than slacks because she is more
likely to get the job. Taken aback, we
all asked what she meant by this.
Calmly, she explained that a woman showing extra skin by wearing a skirt
or a low cut top has a better chance of getting a job than someone who is more
covered up or casual. It is sad, but
about a third of women
are happy to wear skimpy clothing to win bonuses and promotions. We should not be thinking of what to wear to
earn a promotion, but rather what skill of ours will help us earn a
promotion. With this distorted way of
thinking, we are destroying the equality we all worked so hard to achieve.
How can we look
to Hitler with such disgust when we ourselves are judging people by mere details
rather than as whole human beings? It
may sound like a stretch to mention Hitler in a situation as such, but come on
people! We are in a new century, a fresh
generation. We are leading something
unlike anything in the past with all of our advancements as a human race, yet
still we dwell on the inequality that we feel from people of different genders,
races and sexualities. We are advancing
in so many ways, but we are still caught in the ignorance of inequality. Is this what our kids are going to have in their
impressionable minds? That Sarah is more
capable than Shaniqua, and that bare legs get promotions more than raw
skills? Please, help save our kids’ generations and stop being so
damn ignorant. We are all human and when
we get down to it, we are all just a bunch of bones surrounded by blood and
organs.
You're citing a three year old "survey" by a B2B web site that was published in order to drive traffic to their web site.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking as someone who spent 90 minutes last week screening a stack of 120 resumes... a person's name does have an impact on whether they got recommended for a phone screen. But only marginally -- the layout and font choices of the resume, their prior experience and education, and whether they are correctly using the "buzz words" for the field they will be interviewing for. An ethnic name would not alone get their resume rejected. But since the ability to write and communicate in English is important, if they were on the borderline because of typos or syntax errors then an non-standard name or non-standard spelling would consign them to the discard pile.
I'm interviewing three candidates in person tomorrow -- one man, two women. The HR person sees them first; if any of them are wearing revealing or non-professional clothing, they'll be told "Thanks, but this job isn't for you" before taking up my and the other professional engineers' time.
All three candidates dressed and acted in a professional manner. Two of them were able to field the technical issues that me and the other interviewers tossed at them. At the post-interview discussion, I recommended hiring the one who had the better verbal communication skills. As it turns out, they also had the best organized resume...
Delete